> That really smacks of proprietary software ("you can distribute this
> code without jumping through lots of hoops if I say you can"), and
> I'm rather disappointed that core was willing to accept code with
> your new license on it.

It looks to me like Chris and Core have been backed into a corner on
this one.  I can't see how they could have done anything differently -
the choice in behaviour was not left up to them.  It's a shame, but
sometimes life is like that.

			       _MelloN_