-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Perry" == Perry E Metzger <perry@piermont.com> writes:
    Perry> Linux's ext2fs has a serious flaw in it -- it does not do
    Perry> synchronous metadata writes, ever. You derived our ext2fs
    Perry> from ffs -- does that mean that we properly do synchronous
    Perry> metadata writes, and can claim to do ext2fs better than
    Perry> Linux does?

  Assuming that we do metadata writes, which makes me much happier
about using ext2fs, when would I use ext2 vs ffs? 
  Or are they similar enough that I'd just use ext2 to mount a linux
disk. 

   :!mcr!:            |  Network security programming, currently
   Michael Richardson | on contract with DataFellows F-Secure IPSec
 WWW: mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca. PGP key available.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQB1AwUBM57TAaZpLyXYhL+BAQGF3QL6A11Os4TSiAETsXaTcnb9dCzQf6L0a/S7
HyH1bnZ9OEip6vLQwVBTrZIWbdF/ASszf0CUuBphMFZSzFiAo/Uxc/MGc1OEjnZ/
VnUrp5KOi5/K5LBcDV1uZhkvjA7lhIwJ
=laVi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----