Subject: Re: ext2fs is in the tree
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Michael Richardson <email@example.com>
Date: 06/11/1997 12:32:09
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Perry" == Perry E Metzger <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Perry> Linux's ext2fs has a serious flaw in it -- it does not do
Perry> synchronous metadata writes, ever. You derived our ext2fs
Perry> from ffs -- does that mean that we properly do synchronous
Perry> metadata writes, and can claim to do ext2fs better than
Perry> Linux does?
Assuming that we do metadata writes, which makes me much happier
about using ext2fs, when would I use ext2 vs ffs?
Or are they similar enough that I'd just use ext2 to mount a linux
:!mcr!: | Network security programming, currently
Michael Richardson | on contract with DataFellows F-Secure IPSec
WWW: email@example.com. PGP key available.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----