Subject: Re: Usage of ipnat with 'rdr' command
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Markus Kilbinger <email@example.com>
Date: 06/08/1997 19:53:16
> Markus Kilbinger wrote:
> | ed1:
> | flags=9863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,LINK0,MULTICAST> \
> | mtu 1500
> | address: 00:00:c0:ac:c3:d3
> | inet 22.214.171.124 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 126.96.36.199
> | When trying to 'telnet 188.8.131.52 7777' from the 'ed0' net (a
> | 192.11.100.x machine) I can see an araising ipnat rule with 'ipmon'
> | and 'ipnat -l', but no working telnet connection to 184.108.40.206.
> | What's my mistake?
> 1. 220.127.116.11/24 is not directly reachable by 18.104.22.168. Is your
> netmask set correctly?
Aaah! It's a typo in my mail: It's '22.214.171.124' instead of
'126.96.36.199', of course.
> 2. You may need a route on 188.8.131.52 to direct the return traffic back
> to the NAT.
Hmm, 'telnet 184.108.40.206' on a '192.11.100.x' machine using my
mentioned ipfilter machine as an explicit router works. So in my
opinion the routes are there, but I don't understand why the 'rdr'