>On Tue, Jun 03, 1997 at 12:33:30PM -0700, Jonathan Stone wrote:
>> I *like* the idea of a -stable release.  Maybe we could make it work
>> by always having a `release cycle' in progress; -stable is then just
>> the frozen, release-bound code.  Users can choose whether they want
>> -stable or -current.

>Hey, that would be nice.

Just remember that the "stable" branch, kept separately, for the
FreeBSD folks turned into such a logistic nightmare that finally just
gave it up.  I think you want to make sure that you set specific goals

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Michael L. VanLoon                           michaelv@MindBender.serv.net
        --<  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x  >--
    NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
        Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32...
    NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------