Jason Thorpe writes:
> On Wed, 28 May 1997 18:47:25 -0400 
>  "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
> 
>  > another redistributable compiler -- remember, this is NetBSD, you need
>  > a redistributable compiler -- and finding an architecture on which the
> 
> ...remember, this is NetBSD.  It's not governed by the GPV.  No one said
> it has to be redistributable in source.  Thus, you don't necessarily
> need a redistributable compiler.

You mean, a port without a compiler would be considered reasonable by
people here?

I'm pretty shocked to hear that idea.

Perry