Subject: Re: Style guide
To: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
From: Scott Reynolds <scottr@Plexus.COM>
Date: 05/27/1997 17:58:07
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> I have seen the "bootstraps are harder" argument before, and I'm not
> sure I buy it.
> 1) If you are trying to port NetBSD to a platform there must
> be some version of GCC that works on it.
Why `must' there be?
> 2) There is always unproto available if need be for bootstrap.
Running unproto is harder than doing nothing at all.
To be more direct, I see little reason to disturb the current style guide,
and none at all if C9X will sanely support K&R-style functions with