Subject: Re: gcc-184.108.40.206
To: Chris G. Demetriou <email@example.com>
From: Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/14/1997 14:36:40
"Chris G. Demetriou" <email@example.com> writes:
> Actually, why didn't you just go to 220.127.116.11 to begin with. If the
> differences are only in the configuration files and don't effect
> operation (which i believe they are), then why do we want to say "we
> ship 18.104.22.168" rather than 22.214.171.124?
I was wondering this as well. I know it doesn't matter, but it is always
a sore point when we lag so far behind in the compiler tools.
I wish we could start using the most recent binutils, too, but that
seems unlikely anytime soon.