Subject: Re: Hardware flow control for tip...
To: Ted Lemon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: J.T. Conklin <jtc@NetBSD.ORG>
Date: 05/12/1997 13:13:25
> Any objections to adding an hf flag to /etc/remote which controls
> whether or not hardware flow control will be used?
I have no objections (I use kermit myself) to options like clocal and
this being added to /etc/remote. However, I'd like to make sure that
the same options with different names haven't been added to some other
vendors implementation. This is probably unlikly since most (all?)
other folks have gone to HDB UUCP & `cu', but I'd like to make sure
this is true.