Subject: Re: Why is ifconfig.ae0 better than hostname.ae0?
To: Dave Burgess <email@example.com>
From: Ted Lemon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/13/1997 22:51:34
> Putting these values and options for a complex set of ifconfig's into the
> netstart.conf file means we add a level of indirection that doesn't
> (necassarily) gain us anything, and makes a file with (primarily)
> boolean choices into a more complex beast than we need.
Netstart.conf? Why not rc.conf? And why is it "complicated" to
do something like:
ifconfig_le0_1=inet 184.108.40.206 netmask 255.255.255.240 media UTP
ifconfig_le0_2=inet alias 220.127.116.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
Why is this better than having a seperate file for this information?
> Other considerations start to pop up as well. As the system gets more
> complex (a couple of network interfaces, a firewall, a half dozen PPP
> sessions, etc.) leaving that stuff in the ifconfig.XXX file
> compartmentalizes it. Trying to add everything into the netstart.conf
> file would just complicate the file.
I'm not at all comfortable with the idea of putting firewall
configuration information into /etc/ifconfig.??? - that belongs in the
firewall config file. Nobody's proposing that there be one big
unified config file for the whole system - what I've seen so far is
just a proposal to move as much startup configuration as possible into
one file, which sounds like a really good idea to me.