Subject: Re: long long vs. -ansi...
To: None <is@Beverly.Rhein.DE, current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Andrew Reilly <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/12/1997 10:30:37
On Thu, Apr 10, 1997 at 09:56:17AM +0000, is@Beverly.Rhein.DE wrote:
> Andrew Reilly ( wrote:
> : > 64-bit integers as a native type.
> : 
> : I would suggest that a struct {unsigned long; long;} would
> May I point out that you are thinking little-endian?

It's true, I was at the time, but my understanding was that
this would have to be in an architecture-dependant file
anyway, because some archs would just use "long" where long
was 64 bits.  Of course on big endian machines you'd do

	struct {long; unsigned long};


"The steady state of disks is full."
				-- Ken Thompson