Subject: use of securelevel.
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Darren Reed <email@example.com>
Date: 04/03/1997 23:16:01
I'm aware of the kernel recognising securelevel having a value of -1, 0, 1
or 2 and above but are there any plans for implementing something more than
It has been suggested that IP Filter disallow changes to filter rules if
securelevel is set to some level...(I think 3 was the suggestion).
However, before doing this, I want to poll people on whether they think
three is appropriate, or should 10 be used (say) as a synonym for
"firewall security level".