On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, matthew green wrote:

> 
>    ... it hasn't helped that there are no lkm devices in the NetBSD tree
> 
> huh ?

no DEVICES I said, there are plenty of filesystems, syscalls and misc 
modules to look at (and I have :) but it says in the TODO file

$NetBSD: TODO,v 1.2 1996/11/05 02:34:24 explorer Exp $

Always a lot to do.  :)

o  Learn how loadable devices can configure themselves, like the interrupt,
   dma, probing, attaching, etc.  Then start adding some of those to the
   lkm tree.

> the share/lkm has existed for as long as NetBSD has supported
> LKM's, and the sys/lkm has existed since before 1.2 was released
> (but _after_ 1.2 was branched).

I appreciate and applaud all the work that has gone into this, I'm not
complaining - only noting facts - when I've finished the driver I'm trying to
write (he says, confidently :) then it will no doubt take its place under 
sys/lkm/dev as an example to others, if needed..  

iain