Subject: Re: shared libraries
To: Grzegorz Wojtowicz <grzesiek@ajax.umcs.lublin.pl>
From: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 01/29/1997 19:44:31
On Tue, 28 Jan 1997 21:14:07 +0100 (MET) Grzegorz Wojtowicz wrote:
> Porting software from other OS's to netbsd makes me sometimes spend a lot
> of time.
You must port strange software. NetBSD is the easiest platform I've ever
ported to. SCO Unix, HP-UX, AIX and Solaris are all much more annoying.
> Apart from the fact that its poor POSIX compliant
Flame bait? NetBSD isn't 100% POSIX compliant but it is very close.
What problems have you observed? What is your authority for POSIX
compliance (book, copy of the standard, ...)?
> My question is: How does netbsd treat shared libs and if it differs
> significantly from other unixes ?
Very similar to SunOS, I thought, and in fact the ld manual page says
so:
HISTORY
The shared library model employed by ld appeared first in SunOS 4.0.
I'll let someone else answer the dynamic loading question if they care
to since I am not familiar with it.
Giles