Subject: Re: What is happening with libpthread???
To: None <, current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Ty Sarna <>
List: current-users
Date: 01/21/1997 01:02:03
In article <> you write:
> So, as far as I can tell, Mach 3.0 was sufficiently _slow_ that just
> about nobody here (at CMU) wanted to run it on their desktops.
> Apparently, that's gotten better with the work done at Utah, but i'd
> trust what I've heard people say about whole system performance rather
> than the numbers that the Mach group published...

Besides, didn't SUP come from the Mach group? That's reason enough to be
wary of Mach ;-)