Subject: Re: NeXT port... Any interest or work in progress?
To: Peter Seebach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christian Kuhtz <email@example.com>
Date: 12/08/1996 22:30:00
Plan9 is not a complete port, and it doesn't even run terribly well. I have
the set of CD's here and I'm not impressed. Aside from that, we cannot use
Lucent Technologies' code because of the god awful copyright on it. I might
be able to write up how Lucent talks to the hardware and someone else could
reinvent the wheel, however, I need to look into my licenses again cause I
remember there was something about reengineering efforts and I don't want to
get into that mess again.
Further discussion of NetBSD/next should be moved to firstname.lastname@example.org.
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996 23:19:25 -0600 (CST), Peter Seebach <email@example.com> wrote:
> I just inherited (well, am borrowing, probably indefinitely, from the
> widow) an old NeXT. I love this machine (it's what I learned to program
> on), but realize that I might at some point want to run NetBSD on it...
> and I see no arch/next. :) There are plenty of other options, such as
> Plan 9, but I'm sort of curious.
Christian Kuhtz firstname.lastname@example.org - hm, email@example.com - wk
Network/UNIX Specialist BOYCOTT INTERNET SPAM http://www.vix.com/spam
Paranet, Inc. http://www.paranet.com/