Subject: Re: amd
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 12/03/1996 01:11:06
In article <199612022325.SAA05362@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> firstname.lastname@example.org (Ken Hornstein) writes:
>Version 5.3 never quite came out of beta, and there were a number of UPL
>releases (Unofficial Patch Levels). Last time I looked AMD was up to
>One of the features added in one of the unofficial patches was the very feature
>you mention. Last I hear, though, it was pretty buggy (but that was a while
>ago; it might be better now).
>>Also on the same subject - I once saw a statemenet that amd always
>>mounted drives with NFS v2, even if the server support v3. Is this true,
>>or just a wives' tale?
>I am pretty sure this is actually true, unfortunately. I remember seeing
>some patches to make AMD support V3, though.
I am in the amd-workers mailing list and I have seen no traffic lately.
I've also sent mail to the person that currently maintains amd and have
received no reply. I am interested in those patches. I have the latest
version of amd, running on NetBSD with NFSV3, but I wanted to add the
general V3 patches before I integrated it in the tree.