Subject: Re: why routed
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Michael Richardson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/17/1996 20:36:08
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Thorpe <email@example.com> writes:
Jason> On Sun, 17 Nov 1996 14:12:19 -0500 Michael Richardson
Jason> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I have been wondering why routed is still even built for
>> NetBSD? Why not distribute a gated with a routed compatible
Jason> The licencing terms on gated prevent NetBSD from
Jason> integrating it as part of the source tree.
Right, that didn't occur to me. I had assumed that gated was
originally of berkeley origin. What concerns me is that we are
distributing routed; my experience is that more naive system
administrators are mislead by its presence than helped.
Experienced system administrators know to either:
-install gated (big network)
-use static routes (small network)
I believe that routed still does not deal with P2P links?
:!mcr!: | Network security consulting and
Michael Richardson | contract programming
WWW: email@example.com. PGP key available.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----