der Mouse writes:
> core seems to consider neither (a) nor (b) acceptable.  Given the
> presence of the "unsupported" (meaning, supported only by other users,
> not by NetBSD core) patches for people who just want it to work in i386
> machines and don't care that the resulting source tree has at least one
> of problems (a) or (b), I see nothing greatly wrong with this.  And I
> understand work is underway on (c)....

I will repeat for everyone's benefit that unofficial bounce buffer
patches are up on ftp.netbsd.org for people to relieve their problems
on port-i386 while the right solution is being finished.

Perry