Subject: Re: MACHINE_NONCONTIG
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Wolfgang Solfrank <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/15/1996 15:51:20
> Well, some macs have contiguous memory, others have holes... The macs
> have been using MACHINE_NONCONTIG for some time (0.9 or 1.0, I think).
I hope you are not saying that you are using !MACHINE_NONCONTIG for the
machines which don't have holes.
> If we want to do that, it would make sense to reverse the define to
> be MACHINE_CONTIG and define that on the ports where it isn't used.
> It does make some sense to move all ports to the MACHINE_NONCONTIG
> interface since it would mean one less conditional in the VM system
> and the MACHINE_CONTIG can be represented as a MACHINE_NONCONTIG
> configuration with one bank.
May make sense to rename the option.
ws@TooLs.DE (Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH) +49-228-985800