Subject: Re: printf formats again
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Peter Seebach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/14/1996 23:57:57
I submitted a proposal for user-redefinable printf, but it was not approved,
because it was not really a proposal, just a "does this look cool". ;)
I've done some research on this; the way that Thompson did it, which is
basically correct, is to distinguish between "format" and "modifier"
is a modifier followed by a format. Perhaps we should use things lke
for size_t and off_t?
(We can; they're implementation space, not ANSI space.)