Subject: Re: Mail list envelope sender address
To: Jan-Hinrich Fessel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christian Kuhtz <email@example.com>
Date: 11/14/1996 10:17:14
On Thu, 14 Nov 1996 03:33:46 +0100, Jan-Hinrich Fessel =
> There are two ways of touching wrt. mail: relaying and modifying the
> contents. When I see Headers of this form I usually am safe to assume =
> someone is laying hands on the mail whom the MTA doesn't trust.
> OK, the line with "invoked from smtpd" is looking less fishy than the
> other one, but nonetheless it looks fishy.
Hmm, the thing's really that there aren't any trust relationships at all =
in what MTA's do, or a more of global sort of trust.
> And, btw, breaking up your long lines wouldn't hurt either. I don't =
> how to do it with the NextMailer, but you may eventually find out ;-)
Nope. It's MIME Mail, and therefore there's no need to do that. The one =
who can't handle the presentation is your end. ;-) And in plain text it =
is actually split up just fine.
So, just leave it the way it is. Heck, if we were gating in and out of =
X.400 I could see the point, but this is just a minor cosmetic defect. =
Think of it as speckles ;-).
> > Relax, nothing wrong with this setup.
> But there is nothing elegant with it, too...
RFC822 isn't elegant in the first place ;-) Doesn't need to be either. =
It does the job, and Internet mail delivery will never win a beauty =
> > ;-).. und unertraeglich ist was beim Herunterfallen zerbricht? ;-)
> Nicht wirklich, es ist schon auch unertr=E4gliche, wenn es f=E4llt. Der =
> wurde =FCbrigens anl=E4=DFlich einer Modenschau gepr=E4gt.
Sick ;-) I don't understand how someone came up with the idea to coin =
this for a fashion show. Baaaaaaad marketeer. ;-)
Christian Kuhtz <firstname.lastname@example.org>, office: email@example.com
Network/UNIX Specialist for Paranet, Inc. http://www.paranet.com/
Supercomputing Junkie, et al [MIME/NeXTmail accepted]
---- BOYCOTT INTERNET SPAM! See URL http://www.vix.com/spam/ ----
I speak for myself only.