Subject: Re: LKM support
To: Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 11/07/1996 18:58:49
>> You should be able to use MFS without FFS; MFS should pull in the
>> necessary FFS bits on its own. If it doesn't, I'd call that a bug.
>And just how would you suggest this be done?
>If I link in the ffs system automatically, that's ok. If the mfs
>LKM contains the ffs code internally, then you're screwed when you try
>to load both mfs and ffs due to duplicate symbols.
Compile both the ffs and mfs LKMs to refer to a third lkm containing
shared ffs subroutines. Load those subrourites before loading either
the ffs or mfs LKMs.