Subject: Re: LKM support
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/07/1996 12:29:00
>From: Michael Graff <email@example.com>
>Date: 07 Nov 1996 11:50:30 -0500
>Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> You should be able to use MFS without FFS; MFS should pull in the
>> necessary FFS bits on its own. If it doesn't, I'd call that a bug.
>And just how would you suggest this be done?
>If I link in the ffs system automatically, that's ok. If the mfs
>LKM contains the ffs code internally, then you're screwed when you try
>to load both mfs and ffs due to duplicate symbols.
You'd have to feed modload a library (.a) instead of an object (.o).
Then, when modload links the module against the kernel, it pulls in
the FFS support only if it's needed.
Mike Long <email@example.com> <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil