Subject: Re: LKM support
To: Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael Graff <email@example.com>
Date: 11/07/1996 11:50:30
Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> You should be able to use MFS without FFS; MFS should pull in the
> necessary FFS bits on its own. If it doesn't, I'd call that a bug.
And just how would you suggest this be done?
If I link in the ffs system automatically, that's ok. If the mfs
LKM contains the ffs code internally, then you're screwed when you try
to load both mfs and ffs due to duplicate symbols.