Subject: Re: Help compiling i386 kernel pls.: Elf32_Ehdr
To: Gary \"D.\" Timuss <G.D.Timuss@uea.ac.uk>
From: Frank van der Linden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/01/1996 13:44:11
Quoting Gary "D." Timuss,
> (a) How did anyone _know_ this? I didn't see anything on this list,
> /doc/CHANGES doesn't say anything, and options(4) says nothing either.
> I now see these are contained within the sample options files, but there
> is no indication of their essentialness.
Actually, I think it was mentioned twice on this list. But one of those
times may have been during the long, long release cycle, so it was easily
> (b) If COMPAT_LINUX _requires_ (and logically implies) EXEC_ELF, why does
> one need to specify both? And if "machine i386" _requires_ EXEC_AOUT and
> EXEC_SCRIPT, then these aren't "options" either.
Executable file formats are really a seperate issue from the emulations
itself. You should really be able to compile Linux compat code without
EXEC_ELF (you dont' want to do that, but..). The EXEC_ options were
initiated because the Alpha port is moving from ECOFF to ELF, and who
knows, other ports may move to ELF sometime too.
Btw, there are a few other options that aren't really optional, like
VNODEPAGER for example.