On Oct 29,  6:43pm, der Mouse wrote:
} Subject: Re:  Bug in regex library?
} > A side note; the reason this bites you is that we use "long long",
} > which is an explicit violation of the C standard.
} 
} Well...the reason it bites you is that our off_t, and therefore
} regoff_t, are larger than long ints.

And why is regoff_t typedefed to off_t?  I'd think something like
size_t or ssize_t would be more appropriate.

			---  Truck