On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, Grey Wolf wrote:

> I don't get it.  I'm wondering what we gain from this move.  It's not
> unreasonable for us to define "unix" or "$ARCH" at appropriate times.
> 
> If we fail to define "unix", there's currently a LOT of stuff out there
> which is going to break at compile time, not the least of which is
> X11R6.

For precisely that reason I would like to see some define specifying what
architecture you are running on.   Not all ports use native X servers
based on
XFree86.

=========================================================================
Eduardo Horvath				eeh@btr.com
"Cliffs are for climbing.  That's why God invented grappling hooks."
					- Benton Frasier