[ On Thu, September 19, 1996 at 11:15:15 (-0700), Jason Thorpe wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: `sun' and sparc/sun3's (was: Re: Diaspora, politics, and MI) 
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 1996 10:13:57 -0700 
>  greywolf@siva.captech.com (Grey Wolf) wrote:
> 
>  > I think this would be a Bad Thing [TM].  There's an awful lot of code
>  > out there that depends upon 'unix' (or some variant thereof) being
>  > defined in order to include/compile correctly.
>  > 
>  > What do we gain by deleting these?
> 
> ANSI namespace cleanup.

Yikes!  I don't usually mind conforming to standards, but '-Dunix' is as
old as the OS itself, which should be good ebough for a standard itself;
and I thought it was in fact actually specified by one of the POSI -- it
certainly should beX
sub-sets.

I for one will be adding it back in if it disappears -- I'd rather
maintain one more local patch to NetBSD than attempt to fix a zillion
third party packages.....

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734			VE3TCP			robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets Of The Weird <woods@weird.com>