Subject: Re: Compiling GNU tools....
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Mike Long <email@example.com>
Date: 09/25/1996 20:25:31
>Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 23:12:32 +0100
>From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Julian Bean)
>>Solaris shlibs are quite different from SunOS (and hence NetBSD)
>>shlibs. SunOS's ldd segfaults when you run it on a shared library.
>OK. Fair enough. It doesn't answer my question, though. Can the NetBSD
>shlib model cause other libs to be 'pulled in' in the solaris style? If
>so, surely ldd _should_ work on them (I mean, should be made to, I guess).
This is one of those questions which is best answered with, "not yet."
>And equally, Why doesn't curses pull in termcap.
>If it doesn't because our ld.so doesn't work that way, then why is our
>curses dependant on termcap when other OS's aren't?
Because our shared library implementation doesn't handle interlibrary
dependencies as gracefully as some others do.
Mike Long <email@example.com> <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil