Subject: Re: sprintf -> snprintf
To: Peter Seebach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: George Michaelson <email@example.com>
Date: 09/21/1996 15:30:23
I'm mildly opposed to introducing a dependancy on a non-standard feature,
but on the other hand, snprintf may well be in C9X, so... :)
Sound reasoning. I don't neccessarily say we strip sprintf() out of libc but
I do think Jason's observed set of setuid/setgid makes a good candidate
list to change.
Thats no more a "dependency" than any 4.4BSD feature not in the various
4.3 derived UNIXen and a damn site less than some of them foist back on us.
George Michaelson | connect.com.au pty/ltd
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org | c/o AAPT,
Phone: +61 7 3834 9976 | level 8, the Riverside Centre,
Fax: +61 7 3834 9908 | 123 Eagle St, Brisbane QLD 4000