Subject: Re: elk-3.0 on NetBSD-current?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Mike Long <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/10/1996 10:37:56
>Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 08:38:46 -0500
>From: Jon Buller <email@example.com>
>"Wiker, Raymond" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>Raymond> Um. I had some trouble with Elk (though I can't remember if it
>Raymond> was 3.0 or the previous version). Anyway, the problem turned out to be
>Raymond> a compiler optimisation - something to do with picking the wrong
>Raymond> address from a cons cell (could actually be the 'cdr' function...). I
>Raymond> can check this out if necessary.
>That may well be it. I'll recompile without the -O2 flag given to gcc and
>see what happens. Do you know which file had the problem?
Another thing to try is to apply the patches for gcc-184.108.40.206. I've
done that on my (i386) machine, and have not experienced any problems.
Supposedly 220.127.116.11 fixes the problem that required the use of
-fno-strength-reduce to avoid miscompiled code with -O2 on the i386.
I could send a PR, but there really wasn't much work involved in
applying the FSF patch.
Mike Long <email@example.com> <URL:http://www.shore.net/~mikel>
VLSI Design Engineer finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP public key
Analog Devices, CPD Division CCBF225E7D3F7ECB2C8F7ABB15D9BE7B
Norwood, MA 02062 USA (eq (opinion 'ADI) (opinion 'mike)) -> nil