greywolf@siva.captech.com (James Graham) writes:

> Curiously, why is there an "fsck_ffs"?  Do we plan on fsck'ing any other
> kinds of filesystems?  Do we currently support "fsck_msdos"?  "fsck_xdos"?
> "fsck_ntfs"?  For obvious reasons we don't "fsck_nfs" or "fsck_null"...
> what's that leave us?

Want my guess?

explorer@lenin:~> ls /sbin/fsck*
/sbin/fsck              /sbin/fsck_ffs          /sbin/fsck_msdos

--Michael