Subject: Re: new lkm stuff ?
To: Peter Galbavy <email@example.com>
From: Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/23/1996 09:58:29
Peter Galbavy <email@example.com> writes:
> With the addition of the lkm'able version of various drivers (mainly fs)
> any ideas what should happen with them at runtime ?
> My suggestion would be (especially with the fs's) that the mount_???
> programs be the ones to say "hang on - not there - I'll just try to load it"
> Just thinking...
It looks like you want to subscribe to firstname.lastname@example.org... :)
But in any case, I would actually prefer to see some sort of kerneld or
lkmd running which receives load requests and checks it's "approved" list
for loading. This will also make it possible to do dependcy checking
and such, since, for example, some things share a common code base (ahc
drivers for busses) with only bus-specific front ends.