Subject: Re: misc/2668: login-names >8 chars make no fun
To: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/16/1996 11:58:18
As in: have, say, another file which contains user names, and have
utmp/wtmp point to entries in the second file?
no. in the SVR4 model, there is the utmp file and the utmpx file.
the "system" keps them in sync if you use the correct api. the
utmpx format is similar to the utmp format, except with larger
values for various elements.
It seems that that's slow, unnecessarily complicated, and unless done
carefully can be prone to not keeping accurate track of the
that's why we need to do it right (unlike SVR4).
> you could also "break" binary compatibility but retain the ability
> to read the old format with updated tools that do both.
That's relatively difficult, since the files and/or records in
question have no magic number by which you can determine their
versions. Sure, you could use a heuristic, but it's quite likely that
it wouldn't always work.
i don't think it's unlikely to always work. the utmp has a very
defined format. there are almost always nuls in the `right' places
where you would expect them (at the end of the char array fields).
you could use some kinda of magic number for the new format that
was extremely unlikely to be repeated by the old format.