Subject: Re: cd9660 bugs?
To: John Kohl <email@example.com>
From: Markus Illenseer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/11/1996 13:43:18
> What RRIP V1.12 defines is somewhat irrelevant for the near term; my
> belief is that most people who make CD-ROMs with RRIP are still using
> the 1.09 spec.
Yep, sure. But it should at least take regard to new versions as well.
At first it should use the most recent version of the standard, then
it might fall back to an older version. This can - if my reading of
the source is correct - easily be achieved: Instead of only seeking the -
obsolete - RRIP Flag "RR", it should seek for _all_ existing fields. This
must work even if "RR" is not present.