Subject: Better: nullfs or symlink
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: VaX#n8 <email@example.com>
Date: 04/12/1996 11:05:15
I'm getting tired of seeing output like this on my security scans:
type (dir, link)
Should I be using nullfs mounts to avoid this?
I'm not aware of the vagaries of the stackable fs so I don't know which
is really better, in terms of memory & performance, etc.
I'm also looking for papers on file systems in general... anything
web-accessible that would bring me up to speed with respect to terminology,