Subject: Re: Is gcc slow? Or is our gcc slow?
To: David Gilbert <>
From: John F. Woods <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/10/1996 20:18:51
>	[My description of the sylogics system, deleted]
>	In going through the old HW again, it seems that some of these
> were built with a single 68000.  This puzzles me, given your comment.

If it ran 7th Edition UNIX or a derivative thereof, it didn't do paging,
hence it wouldn't need paging hardware.  V7 would have been perfectly
happy with a straight 68000 and a simple segmentation map.