Subject: Re: Is gcc slow? Or is our gcc slow?
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: None <is@Beverly.Rhein.DE>
Date: 04/09/1996 09:49:48
H. J|ngst, ISKP, Bonn (email@example.com) wrote:
: It is amusing to see that "-pipe" is still missing in sys.mk. Is the one
: SX386/4Mbyte crate still alive which prevents the usage of "-pipe" as
: default? ;-)
Even on a 12 or 16 MB 68030/25MHz, I'd rather use mfs as /tmp... and
btw, if you have less then about that, you should make sure to separate
paging space from /usr onto different disks (not partitions), and both
of them should be fast.
With 16 MB of RAM, I've managed to have gcc consume 95% cpu-time on
average, without -pipe. I don't really dare to try -pipe yet.