Subject: Re: buslogic/adaptec conflicts
To: John Dyson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Brett Lymn <email@example.com>
Date: 04/02/1996 16:44:07
According to John Dyson:
>It will be very interesting to see an MI scheme be as high in performance
>as "existing" schemes. When NetBSD includes its "MI" scheme, it will be
>reviewed by the FreeBSD team, and if it is good enough, WILL be included
>in FreeBSD. :-). It appears that bounce buffers on X86 archs are becoming
>less interesting over time now, mostly needed by legacy machines.
Hmmm I may be about to put my foot in my mount (nothing new here ;-)
but I don't know of too many PCI sound cards. So I think that we will
need the bounce buffers for some things. From a personal perspective
I still have a Wangtek 5150 QIC drive that uses a ISA controller.
With the way memory prices are going I would much prefer to buy more
memory than update my sound card and tape drive :-)
Brett Lymn, Computer Systems Administrator, AWA Defence Industries
"Upgrading your memory gives you MORE RAM!" - ad in MacWAREHOUSE catalogue.