Subject: Re: NetBSD master CVS tree commits
To: Michael Graff <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/31/1996 09:48:54
>i agree with this. how about you just ask the user at
>install time if they want "system V init.d" or "bsd /etc/rc"
>(or something..). if they choose bsd, then you get what we
>currently use. if they choose sysV, /etc/rc does the job of
>running the things in /etc/init.d for you.
No no no... I think:
1) the system always uses /etc/rc.d out of the box, and
2) those who modify this behavior do so at their own risk
and knowledge that packages will likely not install
correctly for them.
(2) isn't a problem. For those who don't mind munging around in
/etc/rc.local binary releases aren't usually used anyhow. For the
vast majority of the public who just want a working Unix (and who
haven't already given up on us and installed linux or freebsd, and who
know we exist, and...) (1) will give them what they want with a
minimum of effort on their part.
you're missing the point that some people _DON'T_ want the
init.d stuff _at all_. i believe that my proposal allows
both people to `do what they want'. i don't agree with
you about your second point. it _IS_ a problem. how do
you _know_ what people don't mind ``munging'' around in
/etc/rc.local use ?
in the case where, say, a user wants the `bsd' method. he
then realises he _can_ use packages, by using the `sysV'
method, implimented in rc or rc.local, where ever you happen
to want it (perhaps at the start or end of rc.local).