[ On Tue, March 26, 1996 at 18:56:01 (-0500), Chris G. Demetriou wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: another 1.1 to 1.1B (i386) upgrade report... 
>
>[re: 'make build']
> In other words, given all possible choices, i'd rather have it ripped
> out than 'improved' to do something that it shouldn't be used to do.

Do you have any alternate suggestions as to where/how a source upgrade
procedure might be encoded?  Is not a dependency maintenance tool one of
the better implementation environments for such a task?

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734			VE3TCP			robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>