On Sat, 09 Mar 1996 15:08:09 -0500 
 "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> wrote:

 > > I had to fix or hack around at least 2 "serious" gcc bugs when i got
 > > started making gcc compile NetBSD/Alpha.
 > 
 > Fine, but why is "unproto" an unacceptable alternative during the
 > bootstrap process?

Can we just put this to rest?  I mean, don't we have more important 
things to argue about?

(PS, I for one, don't want to go through the tree and remove every bloody 
__P(), especially when I find them useful.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939