Subject: Re: Routed, anyone?
To: Neil J. McRae <email@example.com>
From: Eric S. Hvozda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/08/1996 11:25:32
On Fri, 08 Mar 1996 09:48:47 +0000 email@example.com wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 1996 22:20:36 -0500 (EST)
> "Alec H. Peterson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > As far as cisco's not being able to handle the updates, I think it has
> > been displayed that they can handle that kind of load quite well.
> > Granted re-calculating routes does take a good chunk out of a CPU,
> > most of the backbone routers nowadays can handle it without much
> > trouble.
> So why is it that esteemed people such as Sean Doran are pleading with people
> to use CIDR blocks and to redude the number of advertised routes that
> are announced to the rest of the world? I'll tell you. The routers on the
> bigger backbones melt down under a high amount of updates, I've seen Sprint,
> and BTNet fall over totally because of routeing table updates.
I agree with Alec, I don't think it's an CPU issue. Memory, now
that's a bird of a different color. I was under the impression CIDR was
to help ip-space exhaustion and memory consumption on the routes
(them route tables gettin' big boss!)...