Subject: Re: identd not responding (?)
To: Neil J. McRae <neil@domino.org>
From: Scott Reynolds <scottr@plexus.com>
List: current-users
Date: 02/28/1996 15:56:59
On Wed, 28 Feb 1996, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:33:48 -0500
> David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > > ident stream tcp wait nobody.kmem /usr/libexec/identd ide
> ntd -w -t60 -e -N
> >
> > Isn't nobody.kmem an incredibly bad idea? Nobody is supposed to be
> > the least privileged UID. Potentially many users can run arbitrary
> > cgi-bin scripts or whatever as nobody.
I would say that any web server that is set up to run anything as
"nobody" -- instead of a new, unprivileged uid -- is set up wrong. I
make it a point to assign a new uid for each service on our firewall
machines, which can be tedious but is more than worth the effort.
--scottn