Subject: Re: identd not responding (?)
To: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
From: Neil J. McRae <neil@domino.org>
List: current-users
Date: 02/28/1996 12:41:15
On Mon, 26 Feb 1996 01:33:48 -0500
David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
> > ident stream tcp wait nobody.kmem /usr/libexec/identd ide
ntd -w -t60 -e -N
>
> Isn't nobody.kmem an incredibly bad idea? Nobody is supposed to be
> the least privileged UID. Potentially many users can run arbitrary
> cgi-bin scripts or whatever as nobody. And yet now you let any such
> user read /dev/kmem by ptracing identd.
>
> I think root would actually be much safer than nobody.kmem. If you
> don't trust the ident code enough to run as root, than at least chose
> any other uid EXCEPT nobody.
>
I'm more worried about attacks from outside the machine than attacks from
indide the machine, in such an instance what we have is correct.
Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae DNS: Domino Network Services
neil@domino.org NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor)
Free the daemon in your computer!