On Sun, 11 Feb 1996 07:09:20 +0000 () 
 "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> wrote:

 > It would be likely on a 20MB machine or even a 32MB machine that you would
 > not be able to measure a striking perf difference between a fully optimal
 > scheme and a simple, straightforward bouncing scheme.  I do suggest a
 > SCSI device independent scheme, even though I know that many are interested
 > primarily in the aha1542 type adapters, some have bt545s's also.

Of course, one would hope that the implementation isn't limited to SCSI 
adapters...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939