On Fri, 9 Feb 1996, Open Carefully -- Contents Under Pressure wrote:

> By the way, having NetBSD/sparc is misleading; sparc architectures include
> sun4, sun4m, sun4c, sun4d, and sun4u.  They are all considered "sparc".
> I think we should consider moving "sparc" to "sun4c" in order to keep the
> architectures straight.

Except that would be a misnomer.  Currently, NetBSD/sparc supports both 
sun4 and sun4c machines; I'm not sure, but some sun4d machines may also 
be supported.  The sun4m work is underway now, and if I understand things 
correctly, will be integrated into the same framework.

--scott