Subject: Re: tmp in mfs and swap
To: None <dyson@freefall.freebsd.org, mycroft@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Charles M. Hannum <mycroft@domino.org>
List: current-users
Date: 02/08/1996 02:19:09
So I named the wrong constant; the point is still valid.  Yeesh.
Also, speeding up the pipe implementation won't affect this particular
area.  You could perhaps make the size of the pipe more dynamic, but
then you're just trading off more paging on each working set flip for
(*possibly*) fewer working set flips.  Either way, you can't expect
the scheduler to solve all your problems.