Subject: Re: Upcoming kernel changes
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/31/1996 11:01:39
On Jan 31, 7:29am, email@example.com (Jason Thorpe) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Upcoming kernel changes
| On Sun, 28 Jan 1996 18:48:43 -0500
| firstname.lastname@example.org (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
| > I am planning to start the integration of all the changes I've made to the
| > MI portion of the kernel to pass "gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes" last August.
| Cool ... I wish we could have gotten more of this done before 1.1, but
| DDB was just too hariy that close to the release :-)
| > After I am done with the MI portion of the code, I'll fix the sparc and
| > the 386 portion of the code. at that point I'll add
| > "-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes" to the default kernel compilation flags.
| What order to you plan to attack things in?
kern, vm, ddb, *fs, net*, dev, compat, sys
Sys is left for last, because if I add the missing prototypes before I fix
the function definitions, things will break.
Of course this is not an absolute sequence because of circular dependencies.