Subject: Re: Recursive grep (where is limfree defined?)
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <Chris_G_Demetriou@NIAGARA.NECTAR.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: 01/23/1996 08:24:36
> > the find ... | xargs ... is:
> > (2) is portable to any POSIX system,
> How many different systems are we concerned with? I can only think of
> 1... :)
uh, I, for one, work with ... at least 5 different UNIX variants on a
regular basis, some of which i have source code for, some of which i
don't. Adding a feature to 'grep' on one of them won't help me on any
of the others, and i won't use it...
> > (3) is more flexible (both because of find's flexibility, and
> > because you can do a lot with a pipeline).
> This is true. But find ... | xargs ... can't be argued to be more
> intuitive than grep, and certainly not easier to use.
If you're using multiple systems, and you want the 'way you work' to
be portable between them, them 'recursive grep' is _impossible_ to use.
> In short: Unix wizards might despise the idea of a recursive grep, but
> it is something that everyone else really needs and could use.
i think the answer here is: if you're not willing to learn the basic
UNIX tools (and find and xargs _are_ basic UNIX tools), why the hell
are you running UNIX?
If you want a mac, go use a mac. some of the advantages of UNIX
(1) ability to pipe data between programs easily,
(2) simple tools that are easily used in pipelines, and
(3) mostly-standard interfaces to standard tools.
why screw with it?